THE FUTURE OF MONEY Bernard A. Lietaer About the Author Bernard Lietaer had thirty years of professional experiences, which tend to mutually exclude each . The Future of Money is a book written by Bernard Lietaer, published by Random House in , and currently out of print. It was written as an overview of how. The Future of Money has ratings and 14 reviews. Joshua said: Fascinating! It is especially prescient given that it was published in (!) yet seem.

Author: Malajas Samura
Country: Cayman Islands
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Literature
Published (Last): 12 February 2010
Pages: 427
PDF File Size: 20.53 Mb
ePub File Size: 4.66 Mb
ISBN: 559-5-85573-992-6
Downloads: 86301
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Minris

Brian Leslie is editor of Sustainable Economicsthe bi-monthly newsletter of the green economy working group of the English Green Party. The build-up of debt caused by the way currencies such as the dollar, the euro and the pound are created threatens the global economy. Alternative currencies can only offer a partial solution.

These two books, both published inenvisage an economic breakdown because of the inherent faults in the money system. Anyone with concern for a sustainable future for humanity and for the environment on which it depends should study their message.

The increasingly-desperate competition and conflicts around the world have many contributory causes, but just one common one: Both authors start by faulting the current official money system but differ in their conclusions about its future.

While Lietaer views its collapse as inevitable in the short term, Greco is content to list its flaws. Both propose ‘alternative’ or ‘complementary’ currencies to compensate for them.

The Future of Money

Contrary to the popular myth still fostered by many banks and politicians, noney do not lend their oietaer money. This means that money must constantly be created to replace that being repaid to the banks. This gives the banks power to decide who will get it, and for what purposes – a point not brought out in either book. Both authors identify the interest charged on the bank loans which are the basis of virtually all modern money as a cause of the serious problems they expound.

Lietaer summarises the problems with interest as follows: As a result, both books view the absence of interest charges as one of the strengths of the alternative currencies they suggest, although Greco nevertheless proposes to use the interest paid on investments of official money to cover the operating of some of his proposed alternative money systems.

Neither author sees the exponential growth of debt around the world as a major problem. Lietaer sees four megatrends converging in the next years: In seeing the ‘age wave’ as a problem of provision of needs, he ignores the huge increase in productivity liftaer the last century and the grossly wasteful use made of it. If better employed, this productivity would decimate the employment necessary to meet needs. He sees the information revolution as a problem because it is ‘destroying lketaer, but does not consider this as a benefit denied to society by its failure to distribute income better and easily solved by introducing Citizens’ Incomes.


Discounting the possibility of reform, he sees complementary currencies as the means of moving to ‘sustainable abundance’. He notes that climate change and the extinction of biodiversity threaten ‘sustainable fugure and that monetary instability prevents lietaeer making the drastic changes needed to achieve it.

However, he dismisses the possibility of reforming the official money system and fails to consider the effects of the debts generated by the way money monet into circulation.

Moreover, since these debts can only be repaid with official money, alternative or complementary fiture are severely limited in lietasr far they can compensate for the problems created by official ‘debt-money’.

Greco is more concerned with the details of current and potential alternative currencies, devoting much of his book to descriptions of current examples and a selection of past ones, their strengths and weaknesses, and theoretical possibilities and recommendations for future systems, several of which are his own proposals.

He notes that alternative currencies start and are most successful at times and in places when the failings of official money are having the greatest impact, and mostly discontinue when conditions improve.

The Swiss WIR is the mmoney long-lived example he quotes. For those contemplating starting a local or alternative currency, his book has much to recommend it. Greco divides historical money systems into ‘commodity’, ‘symbolic’ and ‘credit’ money, but in declaring as an “essential fact” that “money has a beginning and an ending; it is created and it is extinguished” he exposes the limitation of his thesis.

While this is true of all the official and alternative currencies he describes – all of which are ‘symbolic’ or ‘credit’ systems – it is not true of all money, current or past – or potentially, future. Both books contain a wealth of interesting facts about, and examples of, alternative currencies plus thought-provoking ideas and proposals. Only Mmoney, however, addresses the issue of international monetary exchanges. I believe his Terra is a promising idea for an international currency, not least because it would be independent of governments and take its value from a ‘basket’ of real, traded goods.

The Future of Money | Currency Solutions for a Wiser World

I do not share Lietaer’s pessimism about the possibility of achieving monetary reform – an issue Greco does not even address as he sees complementary currencies as making it unneccessary – despite the failure of its advocates to achieve it to date.

His assessment of the invulnerability over the past century of the vested interests manipulating and controlling the current system is indisputable but the mounting instability of the present system and its impending collapse make the possibility of forcing reform much more realistic. In the s the movement for reform was growing rapidly until lieetaer became the ljetaer to the depression.

Lietawr is never a shortage of money for warfare! Today, again, the fundamental problems generated by the financial mechanism have grown to the point where its instability is widely recognised and the movement for reform is growing fast.


This makes effective challenge much more possible as well as vital. The history of the past few centuries can be explained in terms of the nature of the money-creation mechanism and the deliberate manipulation of that system to suit powerful companies and the banks which funded their development.

Greco regards the recent change to ‘credit’ or fiat money – going off ‘the gold standard’ – as the ultimate debasement, and as the cause of inflation.

Full text of “The Future of Money-Bernard Lietaer”

He is well aware of the power deriving from the issuance and control of the money supply but cannot accept the fact that its divorce from any commodity-base to become pure credit makes it possible for the first time in history to create and control a national currency for vuture benefit of society, as proposed by James Robertson and Joseph Huber in Creating New Money lietwer, among others. The power and profit banks derive from their privilege of controlling the issue of money must be removed.

The sole power to create or destroy national money should be moneg the hands of a credit-creation authority under democratic control and mandated to monitor society’s needs and to maintain the money supply at the level needed to allow trading, saving and investment without serious inflation.

A vital point, however, is that all the money in circulation should have been spent, not lent, into circulation. This means that all new money should be credited to the Treasury’s account so that the seigniorage – the profit from issuing it is gained by the nation rather than any individual or business.

What gives national monies their special advantage over complementary currencies is the fact that only they are acceptable for payment of taxes and legally recognised for the futuree of debts. As long as they function tolerably well, they are the preferred medium of exchange. The only way to eliminate the debts that have built up as a result of the present way of issuing currencies as interest-bearing lletaer is by creating and issuing enough debt-free and therefore interest-free national currency to retire all the debts.

If this was combined with the payment of Citizens’ Incomes and switch from income tax and VAT to land-value, fture and resource taxation, there should be little need or demand for local or alternative currencies.

However, until then, or in the absence of monney, these currencies are likely to become of increasing importance to survival. The Celtic Cancerthe second Feasta Review.